<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Virtualization: Prospective Winners and Losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/</link>
	<description>You may be cleverer than any one of us, but you are not clverer than all of us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/05/28/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>There is OS-level virtualization vendors, like  iCore Software.
It is virtualization without hypervisor.
Low overhead, fast performance, less administrative work.
But iCore has only plan to release VDI solution for market.
But it released basic version: iCore Virtual Accounts. It just for desktop. But server version will be soon. More about icore virtual desktop at  http://icoresoftware.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is OS-level virtualization vendors, like  iCore Software.<br />
It is virtualization without hypervisor.<br />
Low overhead, fast performance, less administrative work.<br />
But iCore has only plan to release VDI solution for market.<br />
But it released basic version: iCore Virtual Accounts. It just for desktop. But server version will be soon. More about icore virtual desktop at  <a href="http://icoresoftware.com/" rel="nofollow">http://icoresoftware.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Dream Over for VMware? &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Dream Over for VMware? &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/05/28/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>[...] didn&#8217;t just invent the server virtualization software market, it also provoked a desktop virtualization market into existence. My initial expectation was that VMware would dominate this too, but Citrix (which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t just invent the server virtualization software market, it also provoked a desktop virtualization market into existence. My initial expectation was that VMware would dominate this too, but Citrix (which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sargent</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sargent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/05/28/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Check out http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/education/doc/content/solution/2744531210.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/education/doc/content/solution/2744531210.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/education/doc/content/solution/2744531210.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citrix: Getting Desktop Virtualization Right &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2008/05/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Citrix: Getting Desktop Virtualization Right &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/05/28/desktop-virtualization-prospective-winners-and-losers/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Posted on June 2nd, 2008 by Robin Bloor in Briefings  Just last week I put up a posting (Desktop Virtualization: Prospective Winners and Losers) that gave the likely impact of desktop virtualization on a whole set of vendors, including Citrix. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Posted on June 2nd, 2008 by Robin Bloor in Briefings  Just last week I put up a posting (Desktop Virtualization: Prospective Winners and Losers) that gave the likely impact of desktop virtualization on a whole set of vendors, including Citrix. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
