<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Orchestria? CA&#039;s Acquisition Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2009/01/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2009/01/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rjpbloor</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2009/01/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/comment-page-/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>rjpbloor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2009/01/07/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>I guess you should direct that question to the marketing staff at Orchestria, or better, just email it to CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you should direct that question to the marketing staff at Orchestria, or better, just email it to CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie marks</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2009/01/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>julie marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2009/01/07/why-orchestria-cas-acquisition-strategy/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Why is it that Orchestria&#039;s repeated and proven ability to reduce the amount of potentially non-compliant and harmful emails (false positives)escalated to compliance for review is rarely, if ever, highlighted?

It&#039;s an outstanding differential and a proven solution that I&#039;ve seen reduce the document review que by more than 90%.

No, I do not work for CA or Orchestria and I am not a sales person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that Orchestria&#8217;s repeated and proven ability to reduce the amount of potentially non-compliant and harmful emails (false positives)escalated to compliance for review is rarely, if ever, highlighted?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an outstanding differential and a proven solution that I&#8217;ve seen reduce the document review que by more than 90%.</p>
<p>No, I do not work for CA or Orchestria and I am not a sales person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
