<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KnowledgeTree &#8211; The Document Cloud Done Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2010/02/knowledgetree-the-document-cloud-done-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2010/02/knowledgetree-the-document-cloud-done-right/</link>
	<description>WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timnegris</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2010/02/knowledgetree-the-document-cloud-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>timnegris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/?p=5597#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>Keith,

I am surprised and saddened to hear that.  My commentary was based on having personally implemented the premises edition of KnowledgeTree a release or two back, and we didn&#039;t really have or need any great skills to do it.

I haven&#039;t looked at the latest commercial functional release or the revived cloud implementation, but I suspect that maybe feature creep and, if you were using the cloud version, the particulars of how they have done the cloud might have played a part in your difficulty.  (They had tried to do a cloud version before and ended up killing it and redoing it.  I must admit, I always wondered what that was all about.)

The open source version is solid and functionally rich but not as complicated (overbuilt?) as the commercial one, so, if you don&#039;t need the added features of the commercial version, building your own cloud with the SiteGround and the open source version might indeed be a good way to go.

I will pass your comments along to Daniel Chalef, the KT CEO and encourage him to contact you to see if there is anything he can do to help you.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,</p>
<p>I am surprised and saddened to hear that.  My commentary was based on having personally implemented the premises edition of KnowledgeTree a release or two back, and we didn&#8217;t really have or need any great skills to do it.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at the latest commercial functional release or the revived cloud implementation, but I suspect that maybe feature creep and, if you were using the cloud version, the particulars of how they have done the cloud might have played a part in your difficulty.  (They had tried to do a cloud version before and ended up killing it and redoing it.  I must admit, I always wondered what that was all about.)</p>
<p>The open source version is solid and functionally rich but not as complicated (overbuilt?) as the commercial one, so, if you don&#8217;t need the added features of the commercial version, building your own cloud with the SiteGround and the open source version might indeed be a good way to go.</p>
<p>I will pass your comments along to Daniel Chalef, the KT CEO and encourage him to contact you to see if there is anything he can do to help you.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Nummela</title>
		<link>http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/2010/02/knowledgetree-the-document-cloud-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Nummela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevirtualcircle.com/?p=5597#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve tried and failed to start using KnowledgeTree a couple times in the past 3 years. Mostly we just didn&#039;t have the staying power to implement it even though we have qualified staff for doing so.

I question why anybody would pay $295/user/year when they could just rent some space at a place like SiteGround and install the free open source version there? Given that you had the right technical skills on staff to do this. Do you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve tried and failed to start using KnowledgeTree a couple times in the past 3 years. Mostly we just didn&#8217;t have the staying power to implement it even though we have qualified staff for doing so.</p>
<p>I question why anybody would pay $295/user/year when they could just rent some space at a place like SiteGround and install the free open source version there? Given that you had the right technical skills on staff to do this. Do you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.thevirtualcircle.com @ 2012-02-09 03:20:50 -->
